Texas built the widest and most enforced privacy law in the Virginia family. No thresholds worth planning around, verbatim warning notices, biometric rules with a nine-zero settlement behind them, and an Attorney General who sued two of America’s largest companies over data practices within the law’s first year. For most national businesses the TDPSA is not one more state law; it is the state law that finally applies to them.
| Law | TDPSA, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 541 |
|---|---|
| Effective | July 1, 2024 (GPC mandate Jan 1, 2025) |
| Applies to | Any non-small-business processing Texans’ data |
| Max penalty | $7,500 per violation (30-day cure, permanent); CUBI up to $25,000 |
| Regulator | Texas AG |
| Statute | HB 4 (2023) |
The Texas-specific exposure map
Applicability is the trap. Companies that dodged Colorado and Connecticut on volume thresholds are covered here. The only outs are SBA small-business status (verify against your NAICS code) and the standard entity exemptions (HIPAA covered entities, GLBA financial institutions, nonprofits, utilities).
Telematics, SDKs, and location are the AG’s docket. GM (driving behavior sold to insurers) and Allstate/Arity (location SDKs embedded in third-party apps) signal the theory: covert collection plus undisclosed sale equals TDPSA and DTPA violations. Audit embedded SDKs, in your apps and in apps carrying your SDK, the way you audit web trackers.
Biometrics are double-regulated. CUBI consent-and-destruction duties plus TDPSA sensitive-data consent plus the verbatim notice if sold. The Meta $1.4B settlement prices the downside.
The cure period is real but conditional. 30 days, permanent, but curing requires a written statement that violations will not recur, and the AG’s suits show it will proceed where conduct is systemic. Sweep letters are the warning shot; answer them with evidence, not promises.
Broker registry. Texas SB 2105 requires data-broker registration with the Secretary of State and a comprehensive security program, part of the national registry stack.
Multistate programs should treat Texas plus Colorado as the joint spec: Texas for breadth, Colorado for depth; the comparison matrix shows the merge. Check your consumer-facing surface, notices, opt-outs, trackers, GPC handling, with a free scan before a sweep letter checks it for you.