US State Law United States

State-Level Children's Privacy: COPPA-Plus Requirements in Maryland, Minnesota, and Connecticut

How state children's privacy laws go beyond COPPA with expanded age thresholds, broader data categories, and stricter consent requirements.

Regulation

Multi-State US Privacy Laws

Max Penalty

USD 2,500-7,500 per violation

Enforcing Authority

State Attorneys General

Official Source

www.naag.org

Executive Summary

  • Maryland, Minnesota, and Connecticut have enacted state-level children's privacy laws that expand upon COPPA.
  • Organizations must obtain verifiable parental consent and provide clear privacy notices to comply with these laws.
  • Penalties for non-compliance can range from USD 2,500 to USD 7,500 per violation, enforced by state attorneys general.
  • A robust compliance program should include data inventories, staff training, and regular audits to ensure adherence to regulations.
  • Organizations can utilize automated privacy scans to identify compliance gaps and prioritize remediation efforts.

As states increasingly recognize the importance of protecting children’s privacy online, Maryland, Minnesota, and Connecticut have enacted laws that build upon the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). These state-level regulations introduce additional requirements for organizations that collect personal information from minors, creating a complex compliance landscape. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the multi-state privacy laws affecting children’s data, focusing on the specific obligations and penalties in these jurisdictions.

RegulationState-Level Children’s Privacy Laws
Max PenaltyUSD 2,500-7,500 per violation
Enforcing AuthorityState Attorneys General
Official SourceMaryland, Minnesota, Connecticut

What Is Multi-State US Privacy Laws?

Multi-State US Privacy Laws refer to a growing body of state-level regulations that govern the collection, use, and sharing of personal information, particularly for vulnerable populations such as children. These laws often expand upon existing federal frameworks, such as COPPA, by introducing additional requirements that organizations must meet to ensure compliance. The intent is to provide enhanced protections for minors, who may not fully understand the implications of their online activities. As states like Maryland, Minnesota, and Connecticut implement their own privacy laws, organizations must navigate a patchwork of regulations that can vary significantly from one jurisdiction to another.

Who Must Comply

Organizations that collect personal information from children under the age of 13 must comply with these state-level privacy laws. This includes websites, mobile applications, and online services that target children or have actual knowledge that they are collecting information from minors. Additionally, businesses that operate in multiple states must be particularly vigilant, as they may be subject to the laws of each state in which they operate. This creates a complex compliance environment, as organizations must not only adhere to federal regulations but also to the specific requirements of each state.

Core Compliance Requirements

Lawful grounds for processing. Organizations must establish a lawful basis for processing children’s personal information. This typically involves obtaining verifiable parental consent before collecting data from children under 13, as mandated by COPPA. However, state laws may impose additional requirements, such as providing parents with the ability to review and delete their child’s information.

Transparency and notice. Clear and accessible privacy notices must be provided to parents and guardians detailing what data is collected, how it is used, and with whom it is shared. This information should be presented in a manner that is easily understandable, considering the audience’s age. The notices must also include contact information for the organization, allowing parents to reach out with questions or concerns.

Data minimization and purpose limitation. Organizations should only collect personal information that is necessary for the specific purpose for which it is being collected. This principle of data minimization helps to reduce the risk of unauthorized access or misuse of children’s data. Additionally, organizations must ensure that the data is used solely for the purposes disclosed in the privacy notice.

Security measures. Adequate security measures must be implemented to protect the personal information of children. This includes both technical measures, such as encryption and secure data storage, and organizational measures, such as staff training on data protection practices. Organizations should regularly assess their security protocols to ensure they remain effective against evolving threats.

Parental rights. State laws often grant parents specific rights regarding their children’s personal information. This may include the right to access, correct, or delete their child’s data. Organizations must have processes in place to facilitate these requests and ensure compliance with applicable timelines.

Penalties and Enforcement

The enforcement of state-level children’s privacy laws is primarily the responsibility of state attorneys general. Organizations found to be in violation of these laws may face significant penalties, ranging from USD 2,500 to USD 7,500 per violation. This can lead to substantial financial liabilities, particularly for organizations that fail to implement adequate compliance measures. Additionally, state attorneys general may pursue injunctive relief, requiring organizations to change their practices to comply with the law. Given the potential for reputational damage and financial repercussions, it is crucial for organizations to take these regulations seriously.

Building a Defensible Compliance Program

To effectively navigate the complexities of multi-state children’s privacy laws, organizations should develop a robust compliance program. The following steps outline a recommended approach:

  1. Conduct a comprehensive data inventory to identify what personal information is collected from children.

  2. Evaluate existing privacy policies and practices against state-level requirements.

  3. Implement mechanisms for obtaining verifiable parental consent.

  4. Develop clear and accessible privacy notices tailored for parents and guardians.

  5. Establish data minimization practices to limit the collection of unnecessary information.

  6. Implement security measures to protect children’s data from unauthorized access.

  7. Create processes for handling parental requests regarding their children’s information.

  8. Regularly review and update compliance practices in response to changing regulations.

Practical Implementation Priorities

Assess current practices. Organizations should begin by conducting a thorough assessment of their current data collection and processing practices. This includes identifying any gaps in compliance with state-level children’s privacy laws and determining the necessary steps to address these issues.

Develop training programs. Staff training is essential to ensure that all employees understand the importance of children’s privacy and the specific requirements of state laws. Training programs should cover topics such as data protection, parental consent, and the handling of parental requests.

Enhance privacy notices. Organizations must prioritize the development of clear and accessible privacy notices that comply with state-level requirements. This includes ensuring that the notices are easily understandable for parents and guardians, as well as providing them in multiple languages if necessary.

Implement robust consent mechanisms. Organizations should invest in technology solutions that facilitate the collection of verifiable parental consent. This may involve using age verification tools or consent management platforms that streamline the process while ensuring compliance with legal requirements.

Monitor compliance regularly. Ongoing monitoring of compliance practices is crucial for organizations operating in multiple states. Regular audits should be conducted to assess adherence to state-level children’s privacy laws and to identify any areas for improvement.

Run a Free Privacy Scan

Before building a compliance program, an automated scan of your public-facing properties identifies the gaps that carry the most immediate regulatory risk — undisclosed trackers, consent mechanism failures, data sharing without adequate notice, and policy misalignments. BD Emerson’s privacy scanner produces a detailed findings report against Multi-State US Privacy Laws requirements within minutes.

Run your free scan or speak with a privacy expert to discuss your compliance obligations under Multi-State US Privacy Laws and build a prioritized remediation plan.

Regulatory Crosswalk

Organizations subject to this regulation often operate under these overlapping frameworks: COPPA, CCPA CAADCA, UK Age Code. BD Emerson maps controls across frameworks to reduce duplicated compliance effort.

Regulatory Crosswalk

COPPACCPA CAADCAUK Age Code

Organizations subject to this regulation often operate under these overlapping frameworks. BD Emerson maps controls across frameworks to reduce duplicated compliance effort.

Evaluate your compliance posture now

BD Emerson's automated scanner audits your public-facing properties against your applicable regulations in minutes, not weeks.